perm filename LOOMBA.TO[LSP,JRA] blob
sn#191125 filedate 1975-12-11 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ⊗ VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 .NEXT PAGE
C00007 ENDMK
C⊗;
.NEXT PAGE
.SELECT 1
.BEGIN NOFILL
.GROUP SKIP 10;
Dr. R. P. Loomba
Electrical Engineering Dept.
San Jose State University, San Jose
Dear Dr. Loomba:
.END
In the past few weeks it has been very tempting to call you to again
see if you have had any comments on the material I sent you
concerning the content of CIS280. I sent the material over a month
ago in response to a complain received by me through the usual
underground channels; I sent a reminder to you over two weeks ago
asking for a response. I understand that you may be busy, but so am
I.
Be that as it may, on the basis of your lack of response, I surmise
that your opinion is either negative or that you haven't read the
material. Neither condition would make my particularly happy⊗↓Since
it is Christmas time I am careful to avoid disappointment.←.
It would seem to me that if there were differences of opinion about
the course content that such a forum would be welcomed. However word
usually trickles to me through the underground that %3"the E.E.
department is unhappy"%*. I spent two lectures this semester
describing in detail what was wrong with with the version of the data
structures course outlined in the 1968 CACM; this is the origin of
the course description advertised as CIS280. I spent an unreasonable
amount of time preparing the document I sent you. I do not plan to do
more.
I find this latest flak by Karzmark incredible. When he left the
course he indicated to me that the course was interesting and he was
sorry to go. At that time he had received about forty percent of the course
material and we had covered perhaps half of that. On that basis he
complained to you, Dr. Dolby, and Dean Fullerton. At no time before
or since has he made any attempt to contact me⊗↓I called him at
Stanford; he was out, but I left a message for him to the effect that
if he had any comments or complaints about the course he should write
them down and leave them in my mailbox at the Math dept. He has not
responded.←. Indeed no representative of the E.E. department has made
any attempt to contact me even though the same kind of underground
rumblings were going on %2last%* semester. It would seem to me that
if there are complains, comments, or criticisms about the content of
the course then an appropriate action is to contact the person
responsible for that content. My experience has been that a
different course of action is followed as San Jose State.